By Miira Tuominen
This publication deals the 1st synoptic examine of the way the first components in wisdom constructions have been analysed in antiquity from Plato to past due historic commentaries. It argues that, within the Platonic-Aristotelian culture, the query of beginning issues used to be handled from specified issues of view: as a question of ways we collect easy wisdom; and as a question of the premises we may well instantly settle for within the line of argumentation.
Read or Download Apprehension and Argument: Ancient Theories of Starting Points for Knowledge (Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind) PDF
Similar ethics books
The character of qualitative inquiry signifies that researchers consistently need to take care of the unforeseen, and all too frequently this implies dealing with the presence of threat or possibility. This cutting edge and energetic research of possibility in a number of qualitative study settings is drawn from researchers' reflexive debts in their personal encounters with 'danger'.
“Are you a moral individual? ” despite your resolution, a follow-up probe can be: “How are you aware? ” your own values replicate your ideals, what you care approximately. those values, in the event that they actually matter to you, are activated by means of and during your daily judgements. How do you make sure that your values, those who mirror your top moral self, are literally tested within the offerings you're making each day?
This e-book deals an unique contribution in the direction of a brand new concept of intersubjectivity which areas ethics of breath, hospitality and non-violence within the vanguard. Emphasizing Indian philosophy and faith and comparable cross-cultural interpretations, it presents new intercultural interpretations of key Western recommendations which typically have been built and within the vein of re-conceptualizations of Greek idea, as in Nietzsche and Heidegger, for instance.
This ebook argues that McCarthy’s works exhibit a profound ethical imaginative and prescient, and use intertextuality, ethical philosophy, and questions of style to increase that imaginative and prescient. It focuses upon the ways that McCarthy’s fiction is in ceaseless dialog with literary and philosophical culture, interpreting McCarthy’s funding in influential thinkers from Marcus Aurelius to Hannah Arendt, and poets, playwrights, and novelists from Dante and Shakespeare to Fyodor Dostoevsky and Antonio Machado.
- Aidos: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature
- On Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics 1-4, 7-8 (Ancient Commentators on Aristotle)
- Rebuilding trust in banks : the role of leadership and governance
- Sentimentalism, Ethics and the Culture of Feeling
- The Nature of Moral Responsibility: New Essays
Additional info for Apprehension and Argument: Ancient Theories of Starting Points for Knowledge (Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind)
In the Phaedo Plato talks about proceeding upwards until something sufficient is reached. It is not quite clear what we can infer on the basis of the meaning of the phrase ‘something sufficient’ (ri ßjal5l, 101e1) here. The expression as such suggests that the starting point we find is sufficient for the purposes of that particular inquiry. It leaves open the possibility that the adequate starting point can be traced further up. In the Republic we can find a somewhat similar passage concerned with philosophical dialectic.
Top. )52 Therefore, strictly speaking, Aristotle considers all dialectical syllogisms valid, whereas the contentious arguments only appear to be such (cf. Top. VIII 11, 161a33–b5). Often the eristic arguments are such because they are competitive, and not only competitive, but a kind of dirty-fighting in argument, aiming at victory at any cost (Soph. El. 11, 171b22–34). iqrij5p), if for the sake of reputation which enables one to make money out of apparent wisdom, sophistic (qntiqrij5p); as arguments eristic and sophistic ones do not differ.
I shall use the discussion of the nature of love in the Phaedrus as an example here. The collecting part is short: love is madness. ). Socrates makes clear that the first speech is erroneous in the following respect. In placing love under the genus of madness, it places ‘all mental derangements into one common kind’ and takes them to be ‘by nature one single kind within us’ (266a). Socrates notices that the flaws of the first speech – which make love an inappropriate desire of a sick man – are due to the fact that, contrary to what the first speech assumed, there are two kinds of madness.